Monday, September 12, 2016

Wikis: Pros and Cons for Adult Learners

I did not realize previous to this week’s reading but I have worked on an additional wiki and not even know it until now. In a previous class I had, our group utilized Google Docs to share our ideas with one another. At the time, I thought it was a great way for our group to collaborate and for each to contribute to our project (which seemed to go very well, by the way). I guess I did not really realize fully what a wiki was.

There are many pros for adult learners to use wikis. The wiki allows for the sharing of knowledge between collaborators (Biasutti & El-Deghaidy, 2012; Romeo, Brennan, Rothman, & Mitchell, 2010) as well as engaging learners (Hazari, North, & Moreland, 2009) in a web-based format. By using a wiki, the adult learner is able to work with others in a collaborative way. Each person involved in the wiki project has the ability to add, edit, or make changes so that each participant has a larger stake in the project. It seems much easier to work on a collaborative project by using the wiki rather than another method such as a discussion board, which also results in “higher quality submissions” (King & Cox, 2011, p. 126). An interesting study by Altanopolou, Tselios, Katsanos, Georgoutsou, & Panagiotaki (2015) found that a student with a lower initial performance (based on a pretest) scored significantly more improvement (based on a posttest) than a student with a high initial performance even though the student’s role within the activity showed no affect. The authors concluded “the results strongly indicates that students learn with wikis regardless of the activity’s class and subject” (Altanopolou et al, 2015, p. 519).

I have tried to think of a con regarding adult learners using wikis and having a hard time with really coming up with anything other than the learner may be afraid of messing something up as I was during my last class. The learner may be a bit apprehensive and nervous of using technology he/she is not familiar with, but that goes away with practice and becoming accustomed to the program being used.

References:

Altanopoulou, P., Tselios, N., Katsanos, C., Georgoutsou, M., & Panagiotaki, M. A. (2015). Wiki-Mediated Activities in Higher Education: Evidence-Based Analysis of Learning Effeciveness Across Three Studies. Educational Technology & Society. 18(4), 511-522.

Biasutti, M. & El-Deghaidy, H. (2012). Using wiki in teacher education: Impact on knowledge management processes and student satisfaction. Computers & Education. 861-872.

Hazari, S., North, A., Moreland, D. (2009). Investigating pedagogical value of wiki technology. Journal of Information Systems Education. 20(2), 187-198.

King, K. & King, T. (2011). The professor’s guide to taming technology. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Romeo, L., Brennan, M., Rothman, T., & Mitchell, D. (2010). Innovative cooperative learning. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin.


9 comments:

  1. I'm interested in your experience with Google Docs. I read about it in the readings for this week, but have never tried using it.

    Reading about wiki features in West and West make me curious to know if Google Docs will let you set up widgets and RSS feeds? I use RSS feeds for professional newsletters at work and might be interested in integrating those into a future wiki.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry. Honestly, I really do not know for sure. I only used it the one time. I think DeAnna has had much more experience at using it. It was very easy to use though for what I used it for.

      Delete
  2. Reading your first paragraph, it is almost identical to mine. My mind was blown when I realized Google Docs is a wiki. I use Google Apps all of the time and had no idea it was classified as a wiki.

    In reading your response the idea that a student can learn so significantly in whatever subject through the wiki experience is really interesting. I'm going to have to read that article to see how they were implemented. I would assume it was the implementation that made the learning more effective as I know sometimes in using it with my students there are some who gain a lot from collaborating on a Doc, but they are doing more of the work than other group members which is oftentimes an issue in collaborative work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Where was Google Docs classified as a wiki? I really need to know because it does not meet any of the definitions or base requirements for a wiki that I am familiar with.

      Delete
    2. Hi Ashley,

      I saw it referenced on page 128 under "Wiki Resources" in the King & Cox textbook. It is also on page 7 under "Free Wiki Services" in the West & West textbook.

      Delete
  3. I'm completely intrigued now to try Google Docs, thanks for the reply DeAnna.
    Jennifer, the comments in your posting are thought provoking. The study that Altanopolou et al. did and showed an increase in post test results has a great deal of application potential in education. Involving learners in creating their own learning can pose some risk, but in a setting where someone is moderating the process, that latitude to arrange information in a way that makes sense to them is not only exciting, but assists them in doing their own scaffolding of learning. Thanks for sharing that one, I'll have to go look it up.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for the clarification here, it makes sense. Wondering why the authors posted that as correct information?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree, Ashley. Google Docs is certainly not a Wiki in the sense that it is now used. My hypothesis is that when this research was posted, Google Docs were much more limited in their capabilities. I have only been using Google Docs for 5 years, whereas, if I remember correctly, these articles were posted 7-8 years ago. At the time of publication, it is likely Google Docs was only useful as a collaborative document. Today, I liken Google Docs to Microsoft Word or other word processor. I actually encourage my students to use it for writing if they cannot afford Microsoft Office.

    ReplyDelete